Filing for bankruptcy may feel like accidentally stepping off a cliff – it’s not something most people can mentally prepare themselves for in advance.
When it happens and you find yourself falling, it’s difficult to know if you’ll hit rocks below and suffer permanent damage. Alternately, you could plunge into a lake, bob to the surface and have an easy swim to shore.
Then there are the issues that accompany the decision to file such as tax consequences. The debtor must try to satisfy not just the creditors, but often federal and/or state tax collectors.
In this article, I will be addressing a couple of the most frequently asked questions I get regarding bankruptcy as well as some of the tax issues that can arise because of it. I will conclude with some bankruptcy and tax facts as well as a California-specific issue.
Inside of the Internal Revenue Manual (“IRM”) is a portion on bankruptcy. This serves as a guideline for IRS agents when working on a case involving a taxpayer who has filed for it. There are a few sections worth noting:
First, it is the mission of the IRS to enforce tax law with integrity and fairness to all. It continues with the three tenets of enforcing the law:
More guidelines include the standard of respecting bankruptcy. This occurs when the IRS allows bankruptcy law to be the prevailing authority.
This could come as good news for some taxpayers because it means there is a real possibility of having the tax debt discharged. This can be applicable when:
Bankruptcy is a good option to dissolve large tax debts or for debts that the taxpayer is guaranteed not to be able to pay.
Bankruptcy is also a good option if you are mixing in large tax debts with other forms of liability that you are never going to be able to pay.
However, if you only have tax debt, bankruptcy may not be the best option. Why? Because the IRS has created administrative resolutions for dealing with tax debt that do not involve filing bankruptcy.
In my mind, bankruptcy is usually considered a nuclear option. While it does have its uses, it is definitely worth sitting down and discussing the situation with a tax attorney. This way we can better understand whether you are a good candidate to file for bankruptcy or if your tax debt can be taken care of using a different means.
If you have already filed for bankruptcy, be aware that there are some common tax consequences and issues.
Three very important aspects (or legs) of a bankruptcy analysis are:
1. liquidation analysis
2. feasibility of the plan, and
3. type of debt.
In the liquidation analysis, the taxpayer needs to decide what the creditors would receive under their plan. Additionally, this is where the taxpayer can look for any state or federal exemptions and how they may impact distribution to the creditors. Finally, the taxpayer should add in any trustee fees.
The second part of the analysis which is the feasibility of the plan, will be discussed in the following In re Ayers case.
The third part, the type of debt there is (secured, unsecured, priority, non-priority), also plays a large role, as will be discussed in the Ayers case.
The Ayers case uses what is called the “Best Interests of Creditors Test.” In this case, the Debtor’s plan was to count the tax consequences of an over-encumbered property.
However, to satisfy Section 1225, a Chapter 7 Trustee would have abandoned the debtor’s real property as burdensome under Section 554.
According to the Court, “the present issue regarding 554 would never have arisen if the Debtor used the proper liquidation standard to satisfy 1225(a)(4).
The Court continued with, “the proper standard is simply to compute the value of unencumbered, non-exempt assets.” And “therefore, the ‘best interest of creditors’ analysis of § 1225(a)(4) should include the liquidation value on the effective date of all unencumbered non-exempt property of the estate, including the estimated value of the crops and CRP payments.”
The Court held that, “if abandonment must be invoked to eliminate draining of unencumbered, non-exempt assets from the tax consequences arising from the sale of over-encumbered assets in actual liquidation under Chapter 7, it should surely be invoked in the hypothetical liquidation required under § 1225(a)(4), so the best interest test is met for the unsecured creditors.”
Ayers shows the importance of step one and two of the bankruptcy analyses. The liquidation analysis and the taxpayer/debtor’s plan are going to be strictly criticized.
According to CFTC v. Weintraub, the trustee has a duty to maximize the value of the estate and not minimize the tax burden on the debtor.
Another important part of the bankruptcy analysis is in regard to employment taxes and trust fund recovery penalties (“TFRP”). The IRS emphasizes TFRP above all else because this is money that funds social security, and the government will have to make up this short coming if it cannot be recovered.
Section 6672 of the Internal Revenue Code says that, “any person required to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over any tax imposed by this title who willfully fails to collect such tax, or truthfully account for and pay over such tax, or willfully attempts in any manner to evade or defeat any such tax or payment thereof, shall, in addition to other penalties provided by law, be liable to a penalty equal to the total amount of the tax evaded, or not collected, or not accounted for and paid over.”
Time and time again § 6672 taxes/penalties are ruled not dischargeable. The tax court in Barry v. Commissioner held that petitioner’s liability for the TFRP was not discharged in bankruptcy because it is not a dischargeable debt.
In Washington v. Commissioner the tax court held that although the debtor received a discharge pursuant to Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, not all Federal tax debts are dischargeable.
This was solidified in another case in front of the Supreme Court where they held that liability under § 6672 must be held nondischargeable under Bankruptcy Act § 17(a)(1)(e). See United States v. Sotelo.
Section 507 of the Bankruptcy code puts taxes as eighth priority for claims. That may seem far down the line, but don’t let it fool you into thinking that the IRS lets tax debtors off the hook that easily.
If you are a California taxpayer, the state’s rules do not differ much from those of the IRS. After the debtor files for bankruptcy, they must also file state taxes.
Even so, the FTB states, “once you have successfully filed for bankruptcy . . . [and] once we know you have filed for bankruptcy, we will stop collections on your tax debt (liens, wage garnishments, or seizures).”
The bankruptcy court could reduce some taxes owed, but if the debtor knows there will still be some tax debt, they can make voluntary payments. Here are the benefits the FTB lists for doing so:
Finally, at the close of bankruptcy, the FTB will issue a post-bankruptcy letter with remaining tax debt and collection actions will resume.
As you’ve learned by now, a bankruptcy analysis is not one-size-fits-all. These matters depend on the varying facts of each case. If you’d like a more detailed explanation of tax issues and bankruptcy and how it could apply to you or someone you know, contact Brotman Law today.
We can get you set up with a tax professional who could save you from slipping off a financial cliff. Working out a payment plan with the IRS or the state could get you back up on your feet if you’re clinging to the edge with your legs dangling below.
"Sam is a wonderful, results-oriented and extremely knowledgeable and talented attorney, who really has 'heart' in working on behalf of his clients, and explains options in a straightforward, respectful manner. He has assisted us with great outcomes which have added to our quality of life. I would not hesitate to recommend Sam for his services as he is an ethical, personable and expert attorney in his field. You will likely not be disappointed with Sam's work ethic, approach and his efforts."
-Aileen Dwight, Licensed Clinical Social Worker & Psychotherapist
Last updated: May 27, 2023
Our best stuff: secrets, tax saving tools, and tax defense strategies from the braintrust at Brotman Law.
These ten big ideas will change the way you think about your taxes and your business.
Find the articles and videos you need to make the right tax decisions in the learning center.
It is not just about what we do, but who we are, why we do it, and how that benefits you.
Meet with us to outline your strategy. No further obligation, 100% money-back guarantee.
In an ideal world, everyone would be able to pay their taxes in full and on time, but sometimes it...
13 min read
It is my firmly held belief that everyone should have access to good, top quality legal...
4 min read
The first “Tax Master Class,” masterminded and hosted by Sam Brotman, took place on Thursday, April...
23 min read
We'll answer your most pressing tax law questions in 15 minutes. Please choose a time below that works best for you.
IRS Circular 230 Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS, I must inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this website is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter contained in this website.